INTRODUCTION
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent condition in pediatric clinical practice, significantly affecting children’s quality of life and learning abilities. It is estimated that CRS affects about 2.1%–4% of the pediatric population [
1]. CRS has a significant negative impact on children’s lives, particularly in terms of absenteeism, classroom concentration, sleep patterns, and mental and physical well-being [
2,
3]. Pediatric CRS is characterized by the presence of two or more symptoms, such as nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, facial pain, and cough, persisting for over 12 weeks. Notably, either nasal obstruction or rhinorrhea must be one of the symptoms [
1]. Initial treatment typically involves medical management strategies, including the use of intranasal corticosteroid sprays, saline irrigation, and antibiotics, aimed at reducing inflammation and clearing the infection [
1]. Despite these efforts, some patients do not respond to medical treatment and may require surgical intervention [
4].
The most common surgical treatments for pediatric CRS are adenoidectomy and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) [
1]. Adenoidectomy often serves as the first-line surgical approach in cases of CRS with adenoid hypertrophy, with approximately 50% of patients experiencing improvement from this procedure alone [
1,
5]. FESS has gained recognition for its effectiveness in treating refractory pediatric CRS, significantly enhancing quality of life and providing symptom relief [
6]. Research underscores the favorable outcomes associated with FESS, establishing it as a suitable option not only for adults but also for pediatric patients who do not respond to adequate medical therapy [
7]. However, the surgical process and postoperative care in children are considered more challenging due to the narrow nasal cavity and smaller paranasal sinuses compared to adults [
8].
Postoperative outcomes for children with chronic rhinosinusitis, either with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) or without, have shown that FESS can significantly improve quality of life and alleviate nasal symptoms [
9,
10]. Success rates for adenoidectomy, balloon sinuplasty, and FESS in treating pediatric CRS range from 47%–61%, 80%–200%, and 62%–87%, respectively [
11]. However, surgeons often hesitate to perform FESS on children due to concerns about poor prognoses after surgery, especially in younger patients [
12].
This study conducted a retrospective analysis of data from pediatric patients with CRS who underwent FESS at university hospitals. The aim was to explore the clinical characteristics and course of CRS in pediatric patients, with a particular focus on the effectiveness of the surgery, postoperative outcomes, and improvements in quality of life.
DISCUSSION
This study is the first nationwide retrospective analysis to explore the postoperative outcomes of FESS for CRS in pediatric patients. We evaluated surgical outcomes based on the clinical control criteria for CRS from the EPOS 2020 guidelines: 56.8% of cases were controlled, 37.6% were partly controlled, and 5.6% were uncontrolled. In this study, nasal obstruction was the most prevalent symptom at 87.8%, followed by rhinorrhea at 71.8%, postnasal drip at 58.2%, hyposmia at 44.6%, cough at 24.4%, and facial pressure at 18.3%. All symptoms showed significant improvement following FESS, persisting up to three years post-surgery. However, approximately 30% of patients continued to report symptoms after surgery, a rate that remained unchanged from one to three years postoperatively. A previous study indicated that 76% of children showed improvement 5.4 years after surgery [
13]. In patients with CRSwNP, 86% of 44 patients experienced a positive outcome four years post-FESS without requiring revision surgery [
10]. Well-known risk factors for pediatric CRS include cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, immunodeficiency, allergic rhinitis, and asthma [
14]. In our cohort, a history of previous surgery and otitis media were identified as risk factors for uncontrolled symptoms. Other factors, such as nasal polyps, atopy status, and asthma, did not influence disease control. None of the patients had cystic fibrosis, only two were diagnosed with primary ciliary dyskinesia, and 5.2% had asthma. These differences in prevalence may explain the discrepancies with previous reports. Wu et al. [
15] identified nasal allergy and a higher Lund-Mackay score as risk factors for revision surgery in pediatric CRS patients. However, our study found no significant differences between the primary and revision surgery groups. Notably, the uncontrolled group was younger at the time of revision surgery, suggesting a higher incidence of refractory cases in this group. The most common reasons for revision surgery in children were adhesions (57%) and stenosis of the maxillary sinus ostium (52%) [
16]. Additionally, the revision surgery rate was higher in patients with asthma (19% vs. 8% in non-asthmatics) and in children under 6 years of age (20% vs. 9% in those older than 6 years). Thus, preventing adhesions and scars during surgery could potentially reduce the need for reoperation. Our findings indicate that the presence of atopy or asthma did not significantly impact symptom control or the rate of revision surgery. Previous studies have highlighted these factors as significant in patients undergoing revision surgery [
15,
16]. Further research is necessary to determine whether atopy and asthma also influence symptom control. Anatomical considerations, such as septal deviation and turbinate hypertrophy, should be taken into account during FESS in children. Ramadan [
16] reported that four of the 23 revision cases (17%) underwent septoplasty in conjunction with FESS. According to the consensus statement, procedures such as inferior turbinoplasty and reduction or removal of the middle turbinate conchal cell can be beneficial in reducing symptoms [
17].
This study highlights important demographic and clinical factors that influence postoperative outcomes in pediatric CRS, offering insights into the patient characteristics linked to disease control status. A key observation was the higher proportion of males in the controlled group, who were also slightly older than those in other groups. Additionally, the controlled group exhibited lower rates of adenoidectomy, possibly reflecting the older age of these patients. Tsukidate et al. [
18] noted that symptoms often worsened or remained unchanged post-surgery in patients younger than 12 years. The clinical consensus statement on pediatric CRS advocates for distinct treatment approaches for children under 12 years compared to those over 13 years [
17]. The underdevelopment of sinus cavities and frequent respiratory infections are primary contributors to poor postoperative outcomes. In this study, patients over 16 years of age demonstrated the highest rate of controlled outcomes, suggesting that older age may be linked to better recovery and symptom management, potentially due to anatomical maturity, immunological development, or greater adherence to postoperative care protocols [
19]. The paranasal sinuses reach full development between the ages of 12 and 14. Performing FESS on underdeveloped or poorly pneumatized paranasal sinuses in children can result in unfavorable outcomes, such as synechia, ostium stenosis, and fibrosis [
20]. Moreover, the humoral immune system may play a role in the history of recurrent upper respiratory tract infections. The prevalence of immunoglobulin deficiency was found to be 13% and 23% in patients with recurrent and difficult-to-treat CRS, respectively [
21]. In some instances of immunoglobulin subclass deficiency, serum immunoglobulin levels returned to normal ranges for up to 6 years [
22]. The prevalence of humoral immunodeficiency was 21.8%, with no significant difference observed between adults and children with refractory CRS [
23]. In summary, the failure to control symptoms in some pediatric patients may indeed stem from immunodeficiency, and variations in symptom control across different ages may be influenced by factors related to anatomical development.
Adenoidectomy is considered a first-line surgical option for pediatric CRS when adenoid hypertrophy is present, as the adenoids can serve as a bacterial reservoir [
11,
24]. The EPOS 2020 guidelines recommend adenoidectomy as an adjunct to FESS in children with persistent CRS symptoms, especially in cases of adenoid hypertrophy or when previous adenoidectomy alone has not fully resolved the symptoms [
1]. Research indicates that combining adenoidectomy with FESS can enhance postoperative outcomes by reducing the inflammatory load and improving sinus ventilation, thus increasing the effectiveness of FESS. This strategy may be particularly advantageous for younger children up to six years of age or those with significant adenoid tissue contributing to sinus obstruction [
17,
25]. Our study examined pediatric patients with CRS undergoing FESS, many of whom had previously or concurrently undergone adenoidectomy. Additionally, the study included only seven patients aged 6 years or younger. These factors underscore the challenges in comparing the effectiveness of adenoidectomy across different studies.
Similarly, in adult CRS cases, the preoperative disease severity, as indicated by the Lund-Mackay score, was significantly higher in the uncontrolled group. Interestingly, older patients exhibited notably lower preoperative Lund-Mackay scores, suggesting that they may present with milder forms of the disease at the time of surgery. This could potentially lead to better-controlled outcomes after surgery. The development of paranasal sinuses progresses gradually from infancy through adolescence, achieving full maturity only in the late teenage years [
26,
27]. Our analysis, which examined age groups in greater detail than the previously suggested 12-year cutoff [
17], showed favorable results for individuals aged 16 and older. Once the growth of the paranasal sinuses is complete, treatment outcomes similar to those observed in adults are expected.
This study has several limitations stemming from its retrospective design. Key issues include missing data points, particularly in follow-up data, inconsistencies in hospital recordkeeping, and variations in documentation practices, all of which could compromise the reliability of certain outcomes. Additionally, we were unable to gather information on postoperative management, and treatment approaches varied across institutions. To reduce biases in our study, we implemented standardized data collection protocols at all centers and used uniform criteria to assess disease control. However, variations in the duration of follow-up could introduce bias, as longer follow-up periods might skew the outcomes to appear worse. Future studies should consider using standardized follow-up durations or conducting multicenter randomized controlled trials. Our analysis did not include the pediatric CRS group that underwent only adenoidectomy. Further research could explore a broader age range and include patients who had only adenoidectomy. Although balloon sinuplasty is a potential surgical option [
28], it was not considered in this study due to its infrequent use in South Korea.
In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the postoperative outcomes of FESS in pediatric patients with CRS, identifying factors linked to successful symptom management. Controlled outcomes were positively associated with older age, male sex, and lower disease severity. Conversely, patients who required revision surgery, those with higher preoperative Lund-Mackay scores, or those with a history of otitis media were more likely to experience persistent symptoms after surgery. These findings underscore the importance of careful patient selection and thorough preoperative evaluation, particularly concerning age and disease severity, to optimize surgical results in pediatric CRS. Although this retrospective, multicenter study provides a comprehensive overview of the efficacy of FESS, further prospective research employing standardized protocols is essential to refine treatment strategies and improve outcomes for this patient group.