J Rhinol > Volume 32(3); 2025
Ryu, Kim, and Jang: Assessment of Autonomic Dysfunction in Patients With Empty Nose Syndrome Using the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-31

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Empty nose syndrome (ENS) can occur as a consequence of aggressive turbinate surgery. However, some patients with similar surgical histories do not develop ENS, suggesting that host-related factors may contribute to its onset. Dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which innervates the nasal mucosa, may play a role in triggering ENS. This study used the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-31 (COMPASS 31) questionnaire to compare ANS dysfunction between patients with ENS and asymptomatic controls.

Methods

Twenty-six patients with ENS and 43 control participants without nasal symptoms, rhinitis, or rhinosinusitis were enrolled. ENS diagnostic criteria included a history of turbinate surgery, reduced turbinate volume on endoscopy or computed tomography scan, and an Empty Nose Syndrome 6-Item Questionnaire (ENS6Q) score of ≥11. ENS was also diagnosed in patients with an ENS6Q score ≤11 if clinical findings strongly suggested ENS and the cotton test was positive.

Results

The ENS group showed significantly higher total COMPASS 31 scores than the controls. Although total ENS6Q and COMPASS 31 scores were not correlated, the crusting subscore was positively correlated with the total COMPASS 31 score (p=0.012).

Conclusion

Patients with ENS demonstrated markedly elevated total COMPASS 31 scores, and the crusting score in the ENS6Q was positively associated with total COMPASS 31 scores. These findings suggest that ANS dysfunction may contribute to ENS pathogenesis.

INTRODUCTION

Empty nose syndrome (ENS) is a rare yet debilitating condition resulting from procedures such as total turbinectomy, submucosal turbinoplasty, and radiofrequency volume reduction [1-3]. Patients with ENS typically experience paradoxical nasal obstruction, dryness, crusting, a sensation of suffocation, excessive airflow, facial pain, and headache [1,4]. The most challenging aspect of this severe condition is its enigmatic pathogenesis, as its occurrence is unpredictable and unrelated to the degree of turbinate volume reduction. Several factors, including altered airflow dynamics, impaired sensory perception of nasal airflow, and psychological predispositions such as anxiety and depression, have been proposed as contributors to ENS development [1].
The nasal cavity serves as both a major source of autonomic afferent stimuli and an autonomic effector organ [5]. Activation of the sympathetic nervous system primarily constricts nasal capacitance vessels, leading to mucosal decongestion and reduced nasal resistance [6]. Conversely, parasympathetic stimulation induces vasodilation of the nasal mucosa and increases secretion and resistance [6]. Given the critical role of normal autonomic nervous system (ANS) function in maintaining nasal physiology, it is reasonable to hypothesize that ANS dysfunction may contribute to ENS, which is characterized by disrupted nasal physiological balance. Recent studies have identified positive correlations between ANS dysfunction and the severity of symptoms in sinonasal diseases such as allergic rhinitis, chronic vasomotor rhinitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis [7-11]. However, no prior study has specifically investigated autonomic dysfunction in patients with ENS, leaving its potential role in ENS pathophysiology unexamined.
The Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-31 (COMPASS 31) is a validated, user-friendly, self-reported questionnaire that has been widely used to assess ANS dysfunction severity in various clinical conditions outside otorhinolaryngology [7,8,12]. Laboratory tests, such as measurements of blood hormone levels, heart rate variability, and sympathetic skin response, can also assess ANS function [7-9]. However, these tests require specialized interpretation and are often impractical to perform. In contrast, COMPASS 31 provides a standardized and feasible patient-reported measure well-suited for clinical research. Applying this validated instrument to ENS offers a novel approach to quantifying systemic autonomic symptom burden in affected patients.
This study aimed to compare COMPASS 31 scores between patients with ENS and asymptomatic controls and to examine the relationship between ENS-specific symptoms and ANS dysfunction.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients diagnosed with ENS by a single surgeon at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Asan Medical Center, between May 2022 and January 2023.
A total of 26 patients were included in the ENS group. Diagnosis was based on a previous history of turbinate reduction surgery, characteristic nasal symptoms (nasal obstruction, excessive airflow sensation, or nasal crusting), endoscopic or computed tomography confirmation of excessive inferior turbinate resection, and a positive cotton test. The Empty Nose Syndrome 6-Item Questionnaire (ENS6Q) was administered to assess patient symptoms. Patients with ENS6Q scores ≥11 were included in the ENS group. Two patients with ENS6Q scores of 10 were also included because their clinical presentation and positive cotton test results were consistent with typical ENS, and both reported symptom improvement after ENS-targeted treatment, validating their inclusion despite slightly subthreshold ENS6Q scores.
The control group comprised 43 asymptomatic individuals recruited from the otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic. This group included patients with mild nasal septal deviation but no nasal symptoms, individuals seeking cosmetic rhinoplasty without nasal complaints, and otology or laryngology patients with no nasal issues. All control participants underwent nasal endoscopy to confirm the absence of turbinate atrophy, mucosal inflammation, or other sinonasal pathology. Radiologic imaging was not performed for the control group.
Exclusion criteria for both groups included allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, atrophic rhinitis, sinonasal benign tumors, and malignancies. Additionally, patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, or chronic neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis or Parkinson’s disease were excluded, as these conditions are known to affect ANS function [7,8,12].
The COMPASS 31 consists of 31 items divided into six subdomains: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor. Raw scores (ranging from 0–75) were weighted according to established conversion factors to produce final scores ranging from 0–100, with higher scores indicating more severe ANS dysfunction.
The ENS6Q includes six items [13]: dryness, impaired air sensation through the nasal cavities, nasal suffocation, nasal openness, crusting, and nasal burning sensation. Each item is rated from 0 (no problem) to 5 (extremely severe), yielding total scores ranging from 0–30.
All patients in the ENS group completed both the COMPASS 31 and ENS6Q questionnaires, either in paper form or via telephone interview. Control participants completed only the COMPASS 31 questionnaire. The ENS6Q was not administered to the control group, as it specifically evaluates ENS-related symptoms. Because control participants had no nasal complaints or prior nasal surgery, the ENS6Q was deemed clinically irrelevant for this group.
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Asan Medical Center approved this study (IRB No. 2023-1027), and the requirement for written informed consent was waived.

Statistical analysis

Clinical characteristics and COMPASS 31 scores were compared between groups using the Mann–Whitney U-test and chi-squared test. Correlations between COMPASS 31 and ENS6Q scores were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d for continuous variables and Cohen’s h for proportions) were calculated to estimate the magnitude of observed differences. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp.), and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Comparison of clinical characteristics

The mean age of the control group was 38.7 years, whereas that of the ENS group was 41.0 years; this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.511). There was also no significant difference in sex distribution between the control group (48.8% male) and the ENS group (65.4% male; p=0.217).

Comparison of COMPASS 31 scores

The ENS group demonstrated significantly higher total COMPASS 31 scores compared with the control group (19.35±13.77 vs. 12.79±12.12, p=0.032, Cohen’s d=0.51). Analysis of individual COMPASS 31 subdomains revealed that the ENS group had higher mean scores in orthostatic intolerance (7.69±9.12 vs. 4.37±8.13), secretomotor (4.15±3.86 vs. 2.49±2.78), and bladder (1.65±2.30 vs. 0.74±1.47) domains, although these differences did not reach statistical significance (Table 1).

Comparison of the prevalence of symptoms appearing in the COMPASS 31

Three symptoms—changes in general body sweating (23.1% vs. 2.3%, p=0.006), excessively dry mouth (38.5% vs. 14.0%, p=0.019), and urinary incontinence (34.6% vs. 9.3%, p=0.009—were significantly more prevalent in the ENS group than in the control group. Other symptoms, including postural dizziness (50.0% vs. 25.6%), color changes in the skin of the hands or feet (0.0% vs. 4.7%), excessively dry eyes (34.6% vs. 34.9%), early satiety during meals (30.8% vs. 20.9%), excessive fullness after meals (65.4% vs. 48.8%), vomiting after meals (7.7% vs. 9.3%), cramping abdominal pain (30.8% vs. 23.3%), bouts of diarrhea (53.8% vs. 32.6%), constipation (26.9% vs. 37.2%), dysuria (38.5% vs. 18.6%), urinary retention (42.3% vs. 30.2%), photophobia (30.8% vs. 32.6%), and difficulty in visual focusing (38.5% vs. 34.9%) did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 2).

Correlation between the COMPASS 31 and ENS6Q

In the ENS group, the mean ENS6Q score was 15.31±0.96. The mean scores for individual ENS6Q items were as follows: dryness (3.79±0.25), impaired air sensation through the nasal cavities (2.76±0.32), nasal suffocation (1.76±0.34), nasal openness (3.17±0.34), crusting (2.24±0.34), and nasal burning sensation (1.79±0.34) (Table 3).
Among the individual items, the crusting score showed a significant positive correlation with the total COMPASS 31 score (p=0.012, r2=0.381). None of the other ENS6Q items demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with the total COMPASS 31 score (Fig. 1).

DISCUSSION

In this study, patients with ENS exhibited higher COMPASS 31 scores compared with controls. Among the various ENS symptoms, the severity of crusting showed a positive correlation with total COMPASS 31 scores. These findings suggest a potential role of altered ANS function in ENS pathogenesis, particularly regarding nasal mucosal secretion and crust formation.
The nasal mucosa is richly innervated by multiple neural systems, including the ANS [5,6]. The ANS plays a crucial role in regulating nasal patency and secretion—both of which are commonly impaired in ENS. Consequently, it is plausible that ANS dysfunction contributes to the development of ENS symptoms. Prior research on other nasal disorders has demonstrated associations between ANS dysfunction and conditions such as chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic rhinitis, and vasomotor rhinitis [7-11]. In addition, several psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances, have been linked to ANS dysregulation [4,14]. Because patients with ENS often present with both nasal and systemic symptoms, including psychological comorbidities, exploring a potential link between ENS and ANS dysfunction is warranted [4,14-16]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to directly evaluate ANS dysfunction in ENS.
We used the COMPASS 31 questionnaire to assess ANS function in patients with ENS. This tool is simple, time-efficient, and patient-administered, comprising 31 items across six domains. Although COMPASS 31 relies on subjective self-assessment, it remains a practical clinical method for evaluating the degree of ANS dysfunction compared with laboratory-based or in vivo physiological tests [8,12,17,18].
Previous studies have reported elevated COMPASS 31 scores in several medical conditions, including autonomic neuropathy, diabetic polyneuropathy, sinonasal diseases, and chronic rhinosinusitis [7,18,19]. In the present study, the mean total COMPASS 31 score for ENS patients was 19.35, significantly higher than that of the control group (p=0.032, Cohen’s d=0.51). According to Chen et al. [8], patients with chronic rhinosinusitis had a mean COMPASS 31 score of 22.86, a value comparable to that observed in our ENS cohort, suggesting that the degree of ANS dysfunction in ENS may be similar to that seen in other sinonasal disorders. Although the difference in total scores reached statistical significance, the moderate effect size indicates that the clinical significance should be interpreted cautiously.
When comparing the six individual domains of the COMPASS 31, the ENS group did not demonstrate significantly higher scores than controls. This differs from the findings of Chen et al. [7], who reported that orthostatic, secretomotor, and gastrointestinal domain scores significantly improved after surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
The ENS group showed significantly higher prevalence rates of changes in general body sweating (23.1% vs. 2.3%, p=0.006, Cohen’s h=0.698), excessively dry mouth (38.5% vs. 14.0%, p=0.019, Cohen’s h=0.572), and urinary incontinence (34.6% vs. 9.3%, p=0.009, Cohen’s h=0.638) than the control group. Similarly, Chen et al. [8] reported that chronic rhinosinusitis patients had a higher prevalence of excessively dry mouth (70.8%), though the frequencies of changes in body sweating and urinary incontinence were lower (20.3% and 12.3%, respectively). While the total COMPASS 31 score provides a validated summary of autonomic symptom burden, it is important to note that subdomains such as orthostatic intolerance, gastrointestinal, and bladder function may not directly reflect nasal physiology or ENS-related mechanisms. Nevertheless, the elevated prevalence of symptoms such as abnormal sweating and dry mouth in ENS patients may suggest a broader systemic dysregulation rather than a purely localized nasal condition.
The ENS6Q, a validated six-item tool encompassing dryness, impaired air sensation through the nasal cavities, nasal suffocation, nasal openness, crusting, and nasal burning, is used to both diagnose ENS and assess its severity [13,20]. In our study, nasal dryness was the most bothersome symptom (mean score 3.79). To evaluate the relationship between ENS symptom severity and ANS dysfunction, we analyzed correlations between total ENS6Q and COMPASS 31 scores. No significant correlation was found between the two total scores, suggesting the complex and multifactorial nature of ENS symptomatology. However, among individual ENS6Q items, the crusting symptom showed a significant positive correlation with the total COMPASS 31 score (p=0.012, r2=0.381). Increased crusting in ENS is typically due to excessive airflow through the nasal cavity following turbinate volume reduction, and this finding may indicate that patients with greater ANS dysfunction are more prone to crusting due to impaired regulation of mucosal gland secretion. Additionally, two patients with ENS6Q scores of 10 were included because they displayed characteristic ENS features and positive cotton test results, and both improved following ENS-directed medical treatment. Their inclusion was therefore clinically justified and unlikely to have affected the overall results.
Overall, these findings suggest that ENS symptom manifestation and ANS dysfunction may be closely interconnected. However, because causality cannot be established within the scope of this study, it remains possible that chronic nasal symptoms and mucosal alterations associated with ENS may secondarily induce ANS dysfunction. Thus, the relationship between ENS and ANS dysregulation may be bidirectional and requires further exploration through longitudinal or interventional studies.
Although our results revealed significantly higher total COMPASS 31 scores and a greater prevalence of certain autonomic symptoms in the ENS group, most individual autonomic domains did not differ significantly between the two groups. Therefore, the current findings do not conclusively support the hypothesis that ANS dysfunction directly contributes to ENS pathogenesis. Furthermore, some autonomic symptoms, such as urinary incontinence, may reflect potential selection bias rather than a true ENS-specific association.
This study has several limitations. First, it relied exclusively on subjective, questionnaire-based assessments (ENS6Q and COMPASS 31) to evaluate ENS symptoms and ANS dysfunction. The lack of objective autonomic testing methods—such as heart rate variability, sympathetic skin response, or pupillary light reflex—precludes confirmation of physiological ANS dysfunction and limits the ability to infer causality between ANS impairment and ENS. Second, the relatively small sample size in both groups may restrict the generalizability of the findings. Third, although the control group did not undergo radiologic imaging, all control participants underwent nasal endoscopy, which confirmed the absence of pathology; nonetheless, the possibility of undetected abnormalities cannot be completely excluded. Fourth, various clinical factors—including age, sex, and medical history—can influence ANS function. Although patients with conditions known to affect ANS activity (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, psychological disorders, and chronic neurological diseases) were excluded, and no significant age or sex differences were observed between groups, other unmeasured factors may still have affected the results. Future studies incorporating objective ANS function testing and longitudinal assessments, including pre- and post-treatment comparisons, are needed to clarify whether ANS dysfunction plays a causal role in ENS pathogenesis.
In conclusion, patients with ENS demonstrated higher total COMPASS 31 scores compared with controls, and nasal crusting scores showed a positive correlation with autonomic symptom burden. These findings suggest potential involvement of ANS dysfunction in ENS pathophysiology, particularly in the regulation of nasal mucosal secretion.

Notes

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets generated or analyzed during the study are not publicly available due to restrictions imposed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) regulations of Asan Medical Center but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Yong Ju Jang. Data curation: Sung Seok Ryu. Formal analysis: Sung Seok Ryu. Investigation: Do Yeon Kim. Methodology: Sung Seok Ryu. Project administration: Sung Seok Ryu. Resources: Do Yeon Kim. Software: Sung Seok Ryu. Supervision: Yong Ju Jang. Validation: Yong Ju Jang. Visualization: Sung Seok Ryu. Writing—original draft: Sung Seok Ryu. Writing—review & editing: Yong Ju Jang.

Funding Statement

None

Acknowledgments

None

Fig. 1.
Correlation between Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-31 (COMPASS 31) and Empty Nose Syndrome 6-Item Questionnaire (ENS6Q). No significant correlation was found between the total ENS6Q and total COMPASS 31 scores. However, among the individual items of the ENS6Q, the nasal crusting score demonstrated a significant positive correlation with the COMPASS 31 score (p=0.012, r2= 0.381). A: Total ENS6Q score vs. total COMPASS 31 score. B: Dryness score vs. total COMPASS 31 score. C: Impaired air sensation through the nasal cavity vs. total COMPASS 31 score. D: Nasal suffocation score vs. total COMPASS 31 score. E: Nasal openness score vs. total COMPASS 31 score. F: Crusting score vs. total COMPASS 31 score. G: Nasal burning sensation score vs. total COMPASS 31 score.*p<0.05.
jr-2025-00043f1.jpg
Table 1.
Comparison of COMPASS 31 scores between control and ENS groups
Domains COMPASS 31 score
p-value Cohen’s d
Control (n=43) ENS (n=26)
Total 12.79±12.12 19.35±13.77 0.032* 0.51
Orthostatic intolerance 4.37±8.13 7.69±9.12 0.074 0.39
Vasomotor 0.12±0.54 0.00±0.00 0.268 0.26
Secretomotor 2.49±2.78 4.15±3.86 0.091 0.49
Gastrointestinal 4.09±3.87 4.65±4.01 0.481 0.14
Bladder 0.74±1.47 1.65±2.30 0.068 0.49
Pupillomotor 0.81±0.96 0.92±1.09 0.769 0.11

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

* p<0.05.

COMPASS 31, Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-31; ENS, empty nose syndrome.

Table 2.
Comparison of symptom prevalence in the COMPASS 31
Symptom Prevalence (%)
p-value Cohen’s h
Control (n=43) ENS (n=26)
Difficulty in visual focusing 34.9 38.5 0.764 0.075
Photophobia 32.6 30.8 0.877 -0.039
Urinary retention 30.2 42.3 0.307 0.253
Dysuria 18.6 38.5 0.069 0.447
Urinary incontinence 9.3 34.6 0.009* 0.638
Constipation 37.2 26.9 0.380 -0.221
Bouts of diarrhea 32.6 53.8 0.081 0.432
Cramping abdominal pain 23.3 30.8 0.491 0.169
Vomiting after a meal 9.3 7.7 0.818 -0.057
Excessively full after a meal 48.8 65.4 0.181 0.337
Early satiety during a meal 20.9 30.8 0.358 0.227
Excessively dry mouth 14.0 38.5 0.019* 0.572
Excessively dry eyes 34.9 34.6 0.982 -0.006
Changes in general body sweating 2.3 23.1 0.006* 0.698
Color changes in skin of hands or feet 4.7 0 0.523 -0.437
Postural dizziness 25.6 50.0 0.067 0.510

* p<0.05.

COMPASS 31, Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-31; ENS, empty nose syndrome.

Table 3.
ENS6Q scores in the ENS group (n=26)
ENS6Q domain Score
Total 15.31±0.96
Dryness 3.79±0.25
Impaired air sensation through nasal cavities 2.76±0.32
Nasal suffocation 1.76±0.34
Nasal openness 3.17±0.34
Crusting 2.24±0.34
Nasal burning sensation 1.79±0.34

Scores are presented as mean±standard deviation. ENS6Q, Empty Nose Syndrome 6-Item Questionnaire; ENS, empty nose syndrome.

References

1) Jang YJ, Kim JH, Song HY. Empty nose syndrome: radiologic findings and treatment outcomes of endonasal microplasty using cartilage implants. Laryngoscope 2011;121(6):1308–12.
crossref pmid
2) Sozansky J, Houser SM. Pathophysiology of empty nose syndrome. Laryngoscope 2015;125(1):70–4.
crossref pmid
3) Chhabra N, Houser SM. The diagnosis and management of empty nose syndrome. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42(2):311–30.
crossref pmid
4) Huang CC, Wu PW, Huang CC, Chang PH, Fu CH, Lee TJ. Identifying residual psychological symptoms after nasal reconstruction surgery in patients with empty nose syndrome. J Clin Med 2023;12(7):2635.
crossref pmid pmc
5) Baraniuk JN, Merck SJ. Neuroregulation of human nasal mucosa. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1170(1):604–9.
crossref pmid pmc
6) Lung MA. The role of the autonomic nerves in the control of nasal circulation. Biol Signals 1995;4(3):179–85.
crossref pmid pdf
7) Chen WC, Lin WC, Yang CH, Wu CN, Luo SD. Autonomic dysfunction as an independent risk factor for uncontrolled inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis following functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Rhinology 2020;58(3):200–7.
crossref
8) Chen WC, Chang YT, Chen SF, Lin WC, Su YY, Luo SD. The symptom burden of autonomic dysfunction is positively associated with chronic rhinosinusitis status. Rhinology 2018;56(3):227–33.
crossref pmid
9) Kim MH, Choi EJ, Jang BH, Kim KS, Ko SG, Choi I. Autonomic function in adults with allergic rhinitis and its association with disease severity and duration. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2017;118(2):174–8.
crossref pmid
10) Ishman SL, Martin TJ, Hambrook DW, Smith TL, Jaradeh SS, Loehrl TA. Autonomic nervous system evaluation in allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136(1):51–6.
crossref pmid pdf
11) Jaradeh SS, Smith TL, Torrico L, Prieto TE, Loehrl TA, Darling RJ, et al. Autonomic nervous system evaluation of patients with vasomotor rhinitis. Laryngoscope 2000;110(11):1828–31.
crossref pmid
12) Adler BL, Russell JW, Hummers LK, McMahan ZH. Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction in systemic sclerosis assessed by the COMPASS-31 questionnaire. J Rheumatol 2018;45(8):1145–52.
crossref pmid pmc
13) Velasquez N, Thamboo A, Habib AR, Huang Z, Nayak JV. The Empty Nose Syndrome 6-Item Questionnaire (ENS6Q): a validated 6-item questionnaire as a diagnostic aid for empty nose syndrome patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017;7(1):64–71.
crossref pmid pdf
14) Alvares GA, Quintana DS, Hickie IB, Guastella AJ. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in psychiatric disorders and the impact of psychotropic medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2016;41(2):89–104.
crossref pmid
15) Manji J, Nayak JV, Thamboo A. The functional and psychological burden of empty nose syndrome. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018;8(6):707–12.
crossref pmid pdf
16) Lee TJ, Fu CH, Wu CL, Tam YY, Huang CC, Chang PH, et al. Evaluation of depression and anxiety in empty nose syndrome after surgical treatment. Laryngoscope 2016;126(6):1284–9.
crossref pmid pdf
17) Ahn JH, Seok JM, Park J, Jeong H, Kim Y, Song J, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the composite autonomic symptom scale 31 in patients with Parkinson's disease. PLoS One 2021;16(10):e0258897.
crossref pmid pmc
18) Greco C, Di Gennaro F, D'Amato C, Morganti R, Corradini D, Sun A, et al. Validation of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS 31) for the assessment of symptoms of autonomic neuropathy in people with diabetes. Diabet Med 2017;34(6):834–8.
crossref pmid pdf
19) Kara N, Yao AC, Newton J, Deary V, O'Hara J, Wilson JA. General illness and psychological factors in patients with chronic nasal symptoms. Clin Otolaryngol 2018;43(2):609–16.
crossref pmid pdf
20) Huang CC, Wu PW, Lee CC, Huang CC, Fu CH, Chang PH, et al. Comparison of SNOT-25 and ENS6Q in evaluating patients with empty nose syndrome. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2022;7(2):342–8.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 2,382 View
  • 41 Download
Related articles


Editorial Office
101 Hyundai ESA Apt., 20, Hyoryeong-ro 77-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06628, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-2-3461-9945    Fax: +82-2-3461-9947    E-mail: office@j-rhinology.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Rhinologic Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next