Solitary Myofibroma of the Nasal Septum: A Rare Clinical Entity

Article information

J Rhinol. 2026;33(1):69-73
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 March 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2025.00029
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
2Department of Pathology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
Address for correspondence: Kyu-Sup Cho, MD, PhD, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 50612, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-51-240-7824, Fax: +82-51-246-8668, E-mail: choks@pusan.ac.kr
Received 2025 June 9; Revised 2025 July 21; Accepted 2025 August 20.

Abstract

Myofibromas are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that primarily affect infants and young children, most commonly arising in the skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, or bone. These tumors present with a broad clinical spectrum, ranging from self-limiting lesions to disseminated and fatal cases. In adults, the solitary form is encountered more frequently than the multicentric type. Although myofibromas may occur in the oral region of the head and neck, isolated cases involving the nasal septum are exceedingly rare. Here, we describe a case of solitary adult-onset myofibroma of the nasal septum that was successfully excised through transnasal endoscopic surgery.

INTRODUCTION

Myofibromas are rare, benign tumors that arise from myofibroblastic cells and most frequently develop in the skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, or bone [1]. Although these lesions are predominantly observed in the pediatric population, adult cases have also been documented [24]. They can present in one of three forms: solitary, multicentric without visceral involvement, or multicentric with visceral infiltration [4]. Myofibromas are benign and typically exhibit an indolent course; however, recurrence has been reported in 7% to 31% of cases, particularly after incomplete resection or in multicentric presentations [3,5]. Long-term follow-up data indicate that solitary myofibromas, when completely excised, rarely recur and are associated with an excellent prognosis [3,6]. Although these tumors are relatively frequent in the head and neck region, involvement of the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses is rare, and solitary lesions arising from the adult nasal septum are even less common [1]. We report an unusual case of a solitary myofibroma originating in the nasal septum of an adult, successfully treated with endoscopic transnasal resection.

CASE REPORT

A 69-year-old man was referred to our clinic with an incidentally discovered reddish mass in the right nasal cavity. He reported experiencing recurrent right-sided epistaxis for 1 month. His medical history included hypertension, atrial fibrillation, angina pectoris, and macular degeneration. Additionally, he had undergone endovascular coil embolization for a cerebral aneurysm 17 years earlier. Endoscopic examination revealed a well-circumscribed, vascular mass situated between the right middle turbinate and the nasal septum (Fig. 1A). Paranasal sinus computed tomography showed a 1.8×1.5 cm enhancing mass occupying the posterior nasal cavity and extending anteriorly to the sphenoid sinus, with associated deviation of the nasal septum to the left (Fig. 1B and C). Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a solid mass with intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images (T1WIs), heterogeneous high signal intensity on T2WIs, and moderate enhancement on gadolinium-enhanced T1WIs (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1

Preoperative endoscopic and computed tomography (CT) findings. Nasal endoscopy (A) demonstrates a well-circumscribed, vascular mass located between the right middle turbinate and the nasal septum. Axial (B) and coronal (C) CT images reveal an enhancing mass occupying the posterior nasal cavity and extending anteriorly to the sphenoid sinus, with deviation of the nasal septum to the left.

Fig. 2

Preoperative paranasal sinus magnetic resonance imaging. The solid mass in the right posterior nasal cavity exhibits intermediate signal intensity on the T1-weighted image (T1WI) (A), moderate enhancement on post-contrast T1WIs (B and C), and heterogeneous high signal intensity on T2WI (D).

The patient underwent endoscopic excision of the right nasal cavity mass under general anesthesia. The lesion, along with the surrounding healthy mucosa, was removed using a harmonic scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery) and microdebrider (Medtronic Xomed), followed by cauterization with suction cautery to reduce the risk of recurrence (Fig. 3A). The tumor base was identified in the posterior portion of the right nasal septum (Fig. 3B). Histopathological evaluation revealed a biphasic growth pattern characterized by spindle-shaped tumor cells arranged around blood vessels, along with fascicles of variably hyalinized, myoid-appearing cells (Fig. 4A). Immunohistochemistry showed positivity for smooth muscle actin (SMA) (Fig. 4B) and negativity for desmin (Fig. 4C) and CD34 (Fig. 4D), findings consistent with myofibroma. The patient experienced an uneventful recovery, and the epistaxis resolved completely. Endoscopic examinations conducted 2 years after surgery demonstrated no evidence of recurrence (Fig. 5).

Fig. 3

Intraoperative endoscopic findings. A: The right nasal septum mass was completely excised using a harmonic scalpel via a transnasal approach. B: The lesion base was identified at the posterior portion of the right nasal septum.

Fig. 4

Histopathological findings of the myofibroma. A: The tumor shows a biphasic growth pattern characterized by perivascular spindle cells and hyalinized myoid-like fascicles (hematoxylin and eosin, ×100). Immunohistochemistry demonstrates tumor cell positivity for smooth muscle actin (B, ×200), but negativity for desmin (C, ×200) and CD34 (D, ×200).

Fig. 5

Postoperative endoscopic findings. A: Nasal endoscopy performed 2 years postoperatively shows no evidence of residual tumor or recurrence. B: The sphenoid sinus (SS) opening remains well maintained.

DISCUSSION

Myofibromas, whether solitary or multicentric, are benign soft-tissue tumors most frequently observed in children [3]. When systemic involvement is present, the condition is referred to as myofibromatosis [4]. Multicentric cases often demonstrate familial inheritance patterns, whereas solitary lesions typically occur sporadically [1,7]. Solitary myofibromas are reported to be at least twice as common as multicentric variants [6], with a slight male predominance and frequent occurrence in the head and neck region [4]. Most previously documented cases have involved children or young adults, with solitary lesions more commonly arising in the maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, and oral cavity [4,5]. However, solitary myofibromas of the adult nasal septum remain exceptionally rare.

The clinical manifestations of nasal myofibromas are nonspecific and resemble those of other sinonasal neoplasms. Symptoms vary depending on tumor location, size, and growth rate. Patients most often present with nasal obstruction, discomfort, or epistaxis. Solitary lesions, being benign and slow-growing, seldom cause pain [3,5]. In the present case, the patient’s chief complaint was recurrent epistaxis, with the tumor arising from the posterior nasal septum.

A definitive diagnosis requires both histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation. The differential diagnosis of spindle cell tumors in the nasal septum includes schwannoma, solitary fibrous tumor (SFT), and glomangiopericytoma. Schwannomas typically demonstrate Antoni A and B patterns and are immunoreactive for S-100 protein. SFTs usually show CD34 and STAT6 positivity, while glomangiopericytomas display perivascular myoid cell proliferation with variable SMA expression and are frequently positive for β-catenin [8]. Microscopically, myofibroma exhibits a distinctive biphasic morphology [2,6]. Peripheral areas are composed of spindle-shaped cells arranged in fascicles or whorls, whereas the central regions contain more cellular zones with oval cells surrounding branching vessels, creating a hemangiopericytoma-like pattern [1]. Immunohistochemistry typically reveals positivity for SMA and muscle-specific actin, with variable or absent desmin staining [5]. Lack of CD34 expression assists in excluding SFTs [9]. These features are essential for distinguishing myofibroma from other spindle cell neoplasms. In our case, additional immunohistochemical markers such as Ki-67, β-catenin, or STAT6 were not assessed. Nonetheless, the diagnosis was supported by characteristic biphasic histological findings and immunoreactivity for SMA, with negativity for desmin and CD34. Although PDGFRB mutations have been increasingly identified in infantile and familial myofibromatosis [10,11], molecular testing was not pursued here given the patient’s advanced age, solitary lesion, and lack of relevant family history.

Complete surgical excision remains the primary treatment for sinonasal solitary myofibromas [2,7]. In this case, the mass was successfully resected via a minimally invasive endoscopic approach, achieving total removal. Prognosis is influenced by tumor size and anatomical location, yet recurrence is rare following complete excision [3]. Despite its rarity, myofibroma should be included in the differential diagnosis of nasal septal masses in adults. Surgical management typically yields excellent outcomes with a low risk of recurrence.

Notes

Ethics Statement

Research was conducted according to all ethical standards, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Pusan national University, Korea (IRB No. 2506-018-152).

Availability of Data and Material

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Kyu-Sup Cho. Data curation: Hye-Jin Park, Ji-Hwan Park. Formal analysis: Ji-Hwan Park. Investigation: Hye-Jin Park, Kyung-Un Choi. Methodology: Kyu-Sup Cho, Kyung-Un Choi. Supervision: Kyu-Sup Cho. Validation: Hye-Jin Park. Writing—original draft: Hye-Jin Park. Writing—review & editing: all authors.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a 2025 clinical research grant from Pusan National University Hospital.

Acknowledgments

None

References

1. Morrow NC, Tanas MR, Syed NA, Rajan Kd A. Solitary adult orbital myofibroma: report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2020;20:100955.
2. Lopes RN, de Alves FA, Rocha AC, Suassuna TM, Kowalski LP, de Castro JF, et al. Head and neck solitary infantile myofibroma: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of a case series. Acta Histochem 2015;117(4–5):431–6.
3. Oudijk L, den Bakker MA, Hop WC, Cohen M, Charles AK, Alaggio R, et al. Solitary, multifocal and generalized myofibromas: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of 114 cases. Histopathology 2012;60(6B):E1–11.
4. Josephson GD, Patel S, Duckworth L, Goldstein J. Infantile myofibroma of the nasal cavity; a case report and review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74(12):1452–4.
5. Souza LL, Fonseca FP, Cáceres CV, Soares CD, Gurgel AD, Rebelo Pontes HA, et al. Head and neck myofibroma: a case series of 16 cases and literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2024;29(6):e734–41.
6. Vered M, Allon I, Buchner A, Dayan D. Clinico-pathologic correlations of myofibroblastic tumors of the oral cavity. II. Myofibroma and myofibromatosis of the oral soft tissues. J Oral Pathol Med 2007;36(5):304–14.
7. Martignetti JA, Tian L, Li D, Ramirez MC, Camacho-Vanegas O, Camacho SC, et al. Mutations in PDGFRB cause autosomal-dominant infantile myofibromatosis. Am J Hum Genet 2013;92(6):1001–7.
8. Almohsen SS, Demicco EG. Spindle cell tumors of the sinonasal tract: a diagnostic update with focus on ancillary workup. Head Neck Pathol 2024;18(1):8.
9. Vargas PA, Alves FA, Lopes MA, Siqueira SA, Menezes LF, Aldred VL, et al. Solitary fibrous tumour of the mouth: report of two cases involving the tongue and cheek. Oral Dis 2002;8(2):111–5.
10. Boccia F, Barresi S, Vallese S, Martino VD, Bombaci S, Massuras S, et al. Novel PDGFRB gene fusions in two cases of infantile myofibromatosis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2025;64(1):e70028.
11. Howaldt A, Lenglez S, Velmans C, Schultheis AM, Clahsen T, Matthaei M, et al. Corneal infantile myofibromatosis caused by novel activating imatinib-responsive variants in PDGFRB. Ophthalmol Sci 2023;4(3):100444.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Preoperative endoscopic and computed tomography (CT) findings. Nasal endoscopy (A) demonstrates a well-circumscribed, vascular mass located between the right middle turbinate and the nasal septum. Axial (B) and coronal (C) CT images reveal an enhancing mass occupying the posterior nasal cavity and extending anteriorly to the sphenoid sinus, with deviation of the nasal septum to the left.

Fig. 2

Preoperative paranasal sinus magnetic resonance imaging. The solid mass in the right posterior nasal cavity exhibits intermediate signal intensity on the T1-weighted image (T1WI) (A), moderate enhancement on post-contrast T1WIs (B and C), and heterogeneous high signal intensity on T2WI (D).

Fig. 3

Intraoperative endoscopic findings. A: The right nasal septum mass was completely excised using a harmonic scalpel via a transnasal approach. B: The lesion base was identified at the posterior portion of the right nasal septum.

Fig. 4

Histopathological findings of the myofibroma. A: The tumor shows a biphasic growth pattern characterized by perivascular spindle cells and hyalinized myoid-like fascicles (hematoxylin and eosin, ×100). Immunohistochemistry demonstrates tumor cell positivity for smooth muscle actin (B, ×200), but negativity for desmin (C, ×200) and CD34 (D, ×200).

Fig. 5

Postoperative endoscopic findings. A: Nasal endoscopy performed 2 years postoperatively shows no evidence of residual tumor or recurrence. B: The sphenoid sinus (SS) opening remains well maintained.